- +91-804-1663637/9880591727
- info@srjpiping.com
- Mon - Sat: 9:00 - 18:00
Comparing performance, cost, and energy efficiency to help you choose the right system for your industrial needs
Industrial facilities rely heavily on pneumatic systems for automation, tool operation, and material handling. The choice between compressed air piping and traditional pneumatic systems significantly impacts energy efficiency, maintenance costs, and operational reliability. At SRJ Piping India, we've installed both systems across various industries and can help you determine the best solution for your facility.
Modern compressed air piping systems offer significant efficiency advantages
Engineered piping systems designed specifically for high-efficiency air distribution with minimal pressure drops.
Best for: Large facilities, high-demand applications, energy-conscious operations.
Conventional systems using standard piping materials like galvanized steel or copper with push-to-connect fittings.
Best for: Small facilities, temporary installations, low-budget projects.
| Factor | Compressed Air Piping | Traditional Pneumatic |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Efficiency | 85-95% | 60-75% |
| Pressure Drop (per 100 ft) | 1-2 psi | 5-10 psi |
| Typical Air Leakage | <5% | 10-30% |
| Installation Cost | $$$ (Higher initial) | $ (Lower initial) |
| Lifespan | 20+ years | 10-15 years |
| Maintenance Frequency | Low | Moderate to High |
| ROI Period | 2-4 years | N/A |
Key Insight: While compressed air piping has higher upfront costs, the energy savings typically provide a full return on investment within 3 years in most industrial applications.
Recommended: Compressed air piping
Why: The energy savings at scale justify the initial investment, and the reduced downtime pays dividends in production continuity.
Recommended: Traditional pneumatic
Why: Lower air demands make the efficiency gains less significant, while budget constraints favor simpler systems.
Recommended: Hybrid approach
Why: Compressed air mains with traditional drops to workstations balances efficiency with flexibility.
Conclusion: The compressed air system saves ₹45 lakh over 10 years despite higher initial costs.
Many facilities achieve optimal results by combining both technologies:
This approach typically delivers 80% of the energy savings of full compressed air piping at 60% of the cost. Our engineers can help design the right hybrid solution for your facility.
Our pneumatic system experts can assess your facility and recommend the most efficient solution for your specific needs and budget.
Typically 20-30%, with these specific savings areas:
For a facility spending ₹10 lakh/year on compressed air energy, this means ₹2-3 lakh in annual savings.
The top options in 2024 are:
We recommend against PVC (brittle) or black iron (corrodes).
Yes, we typically recommend a phased approach:
This spreads costs while delivering immediate energy savings. Our retrofit specialists can develop a custom plan.
Compressed Air Piping:
Traditional Pneumatic:
The reduced maintenance typically saves ₹1-2 lakh annually for mid-sized facilities.
our building
HM Geneva House, #302, 3rd floor, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560051
Send it today
info@srjpiping.com
info@srjgroup.co
srjpipes@gmail.com
BRANCH BUILDING
#302, 3rd Floor, Commerce House, Cunningham Road, Bangalore – 560052
© 2019. All rights reserved for SRJ GROUP | srjpipingindia.com